
The New York Times wonders if candidates are giving us too much information. Then the paper lets a surrogate act as its mouthpiece:
“I’m all for democratizing dialogue, but this is just much too much information,” Mr. Begala said. “It’s appalling, really.”
Hmmm. Appalling? I wouldn’t go that far. I see all public figures—from politicians to CEOs to movie stars to sports sensations to news anchors to talking heads—as self-conscious performers. They’re in front of the camera—of course they’re performers! Plus, no one can create a public profile in today’s world unless s/he’s got good visuals.
Bottom line: they’re not my cuppa, but they’re here to stay, because as long as there are public figures and cameras, there will be performers
Here’s what I had to say back in February:
Gawker reports on a “Firm Potent Leader with Plenty of Stamina”:
The Post ruined all our breakfasts with their cover this morning (seriously: “Judi gushes as Rudi rushes in”?? Ewwwww!!!)
Check out the placement of her hand on his cheek. And her hair, cascading just so. I’m going to throw up.
I also once posted a picture of The Kiss:

And for a while I was obsessed with making fun of the PDAs of the Chief Monkey of Iran:
the many loves of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:
July 31, 2006
June 2006




