finally, someone who understands me

Too bad his name is “Elvis“—not that there’s anything wrong with that. Also, he’s a “mere” commenter at Kevin Drum’s site, Political Animal. Elvis has the smartest, truest (not only ’cause it reflects mine) take on how the political talk show game is “rigged.” First, Elvis’s post, then the backstory [e.a.]:

[H]ack-controlled media outlets are rigged to make the host win, and if that isn’t clearly evident in real time, the rest they take care of in post-[production].

That’s why those guys avoid a debate in any venue they do not control. [More to come about this. See the footnote for a preview. *** --ed.]
Lastly, don’t forget that the hacksters are entertainers, and that’s what their primary audience craves. If they wanted to become more well-informed, they’d watch the NewHour with Jim Lehrer or FrontLine. Instead, they watch O’Reilly, who is little more than a superficially credible reincarnation of Morton Downey Jr.

Can you hear me exulting? That’s what I’ve been saying all along, dude. I wish some folks would hear me and get with the goddamn program and learn how to give as good as they get instead of just throwing up their hands and saying, “I give up.”

[I'm no fan of Katrina vanden Heuvel's politics, but I am a great admirer of her spirit and spunk and her willingness to get out there in the ring at every opportunity on the Sunday-morning shows. If you know your stuff and you know how to debate, no one can bulldoze you. But you have to know your stuff. And know their stuff---i.e., you have to know how to debate.]
That’s what started this whole ruckus: Matt Yglesias advising against going up against “hacks” on TV and Drum wrote about it and got a lot of responses (which is where “Elvis” enters the building).

Yglesias wrote:

As I well recall from my appearances on the Hugh Hewitt showing, appearing on hack-controlled media outlets is not an effective method of persuading the audience. The rules are rigged….Television is especially tricky for providing the illusion of unmediated reality while, in fact, allowing a thousand different kinds of mediation. Thinking that you can beat television professionals whose job is to make you look bad on a television network that they control is just hubris. Nobody’s that smart. Nobody’s that clever. Nobody beats the producers.

Drum admired:

Boy, is that right. Unless you’re a seasoned pro yourself, you’re not going to outduel guys like Hewitt or Bill O’Reilly. You’re just not. And if the next day all your friends give you high fives and tell you that you kicked ass, they’re just being good friends. Believe me: you didn’t.

Luckily for me, whatever kind of ego I have, it’s not the kind that wants to appear on TV shows jousting with people determined to prove I’m an idiot. So I’m not tempted. And let’s face it: the kind of folks who listen to Hewitt and O’Reilly and their ilk aren’t going to be swayed by even the most silken-tongued liberal in the world. So what’s the point?

And then some of his readers let Drum have it:

So, liberals can’t compete in the marketplace of ideas, almost never win arguments, and choose to blame it on the hosts of public affairs shows? Awesome. No wonder they don’t show up on Sunday shows: They’re probably afraid that mean conservatives will be there to refute their liberal fantasyland.

Posted by: American Hawk on March 16, 2007 at 12:21 PM | 

And that’s where “Elvis” came in, and where we started.

———–***

This is certainly true of Keith Olbermann, who only interviews “friendlies” … except when they cancel on him at the last minute.

OLBERPLAME.jpg

It is not true of Glenn Beck, who invites people who disagree with him and then wears them down. He too is an entertainer. Indeed, he’s a self-professed “rodeo clown.”

What is most objectionable about Olbermann is that he’s, as Olbermann Watch’s Robert Cox says,

a political hack posing as a journalist and abusing the trust implied in the NBC brand to get out a political message.

Read the whole interview. It’s interesting.

I also find Olbermann repellent. His sneering is … creepy. He’s Basil Fawlty with a following of hundreds of thousands. I was wrong about him, though. I thought he wouldn’t last. So did Robert Cox, who, with his pals who hated on Olbermann at Olbermann Watch, shut down their site in disgust after Olbermann was signed by NBC to an incredibly rich deal.

The site is back up.

In reviewing the intentional misinformation, misrepresentations, vitriol and other negatives being written on numerous anti-OlbermannWatch blogs and by anti-OlbermannWatch bloggers we were astounded but frankly not surprised. By the time lunch rolled around we were beginning to have second thoughts. Clearly, if the OlbyLoons were THAT excited about our decision to close Olbermann Watch we must have been doing something right. There were whispers among the staff that maybe, just maybe, we had been a bit too hasty.

peace via pop

All’s well that ends well for the Israeli band Teapacks, whose antiwar song “Push the Button” will be allowed to compete in the Eurovision Song Contest after all. (It was originally condemned by Finnish organizer Kjell Ekholm as having an “inappropriate” message—apparently, he thinks it’s not okay for Israelis to appeal to reason).

Interestingly, reports Ha’aretz, there is now a movement to help the Palestinians participate in next year’s Eurovision Song Contest. This movement appears to be driven not by Palestinians who wish to participate in the contest but by a Danish diplomat:

The Palestinians are exploring the possibility of participating in the Eurovision Song Contest next year, a Danish diplomat said Thursday.

Two companies for artistic development, the Danish Superflex and the Palestinian Sabreen, have signed an agreement to lobby among Eurovision member states for the idea, and to help the Palestine Broadcasting Corp. with technical preparations, said Rolf Holmboe, a Danish diplomat in the West Bank. …

Holmboe said Palestinian participation could help create positive symbols of Palestinian unity and reinforce the idea of peacemaking with Israel. The Danish Representative Office in the West Bank is contributing about $140,000 to the project, he said.

It’s a good idea.

Bassem Abu Sumayah, a senior Palestine TV official, welcomed the idea. “The idea is benefiting the Palestinians, putting them on the map, politically and culturally,” he said.

Yep. Spread the gospel peace and understanding through pop culture. Now, there’s an idea.

following the abduction story, part 5

Day four of the kidnapping of Alan Johnston in Gaza. At 8:45 a.m., here’s what’s on Google News:

No Sign Of BBC Reporter, Alan Johnston
Post Chronicle - 8 hours ago
The BBC issued a plea Thursday for information that would help locate missing Gaza correspondent Alan Johnston. Johnston, who has been the BBC’s reporter in
No sign of BBC reporter Earthtimes.org
No sign of BBC reporter United Press International
BBC makes appeal for Gaza reporter MWC News
InTheNews.co.uk
all 197 news articles »

I watched BBC News this morning. There was a brief mention of Johnston. Otherwise … nada.

I don’t want to be any more cynical than necessary, but it certainly looks as if they’re holding Johnston until a moment when he can be used to burnish Hamas’s image, however temporarily.